Ukrainian adaptation of the "Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale" (npss)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2024.1(19).8

Keywords:

neuroception, psychological safety, polyvagal theory, social engagement, test adaptation

Abstract

B a c k g r o u n d . The neuroception of psychological safety is a relatively new construct that combines psychological and neuroscientific aspects of interpersonal interaction. It is described and studied within the framework of polyvagal theory as one of the key concepts for understanding the nature of social engagement processes. The present study aims to adapt into Ukrainian the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS), the original version of which is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the sense of psychological safety in the context of interpersonal interaction.

M e t h o d s . The study involved 96 respondents from Ukraine. The Ukrainian version was obtained by means of double translation. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to test the structure of the Ukrainian version. The internal consistency of the subscales and the overall test was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. To compare the respondents' responses by gender, the sum of the scores on the scales was calculated and a t-test was used.

R e s u l t s . The total Cronbach's alpha score for the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale is 0,92. For the subscale "Social engagement" – 0,91, for the subscale "Compassion" – 0,86, for the subscale "Body sensations" – 0,92. These results indicate a high internal consistency of the questionnaire items. Factor analysis resulted in a simple 3-factor structure that explained 56,9 % of the total variance and was almost identical to the subscales of the developers in terms of item grouping.

C o n c l u s i o n s . The Ukrainian adaptation of the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The translation of some items of the scale needs to be modified, but the available version of this scale can be used for research on a Ukrainian-speaking sample, as well as in the practical work of psychologists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bang, H., Won, D., & Park, S. (2020). School engagement, self-esteem, and depression of adolescents: The role of sport participation and volunteering activity and gender differences. Children and youth services review, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105012

Bernatova, T., & Svetlak, M. (2017). Emotional and interoceptive awareness and its relationship to restriction in young women with eating disorders and healthy controls: a cascade from emotional to behavioral dysregulation. Activitas Nervosa Superior, 59(2), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41470-017-0006-z

Brinsfield, C. T. (2013). Employee silence motives: Investigation of dimensionality and development of measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(5), 671–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1829

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Fuchs, T. (2013). Temporality and psychopathology. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 12(1), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9189-4

Fuchs, T., & Röhricht, F. (2017). Schizophrenia and intersubjectivity: An embodied and enactive approach to psychopathology and psychotherapy. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 24(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2017.0018

Gilbert, P. (Ed.). (2017). Compassion: Concepts, research and applications. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315564296

Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Mitra, R., Franks, L., Richter, A., & Rockliff, H. (2008). Feeling safe and content: A specific affect regulation system? Relationship to depression, anxiety, stress, and self-criticism. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(3), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760801999461

Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological bulletin, 136(3), 351. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018807

Gomez‐Baya, D., Reis, M., & Gaspar de Matos, M. (2019). Positive youth development, thriving and social engagement: An analysis of gender differences in Spanish youth. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 60(6), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12577

Jovanovic, T., Kazama, A., Bachevalier, J., & Davis, M. (2012). Impaired safety signal learning may be a biomarker of PTSD. Neuropharmacology, 62(2), 695–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.02.023

Kirby, J. N., Doty, J. R., Petrocchi, N., & Gilbert, P. (2017). The current and future role of heart rate variability for assessing and training compassion. Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00040

Leroy, H., Dierynck, B., Anseel, F., Simons, T., Halbesleben, J. R., McCaughey, D., & Sels, L. (2012). Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: A team-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1273. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030076

Mollon, D. (2014). Feeling safe during an inpatient hospitalization: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(8), 1727–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12348

Morton, L., Cogan, N., Kolacz, J., Calderwood, C., Nikolic, M., Bacon, T., Pathe, E., Williams, D., & Porges, S. W. (2024). A new measure of feeling safe: Developing psychometric properties of the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS). Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy, 16(4), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001313

Motsan, S., Bar‐Kalifa, E., Yirmiya, K., & Feldman, R. (2021). Physiological and social synchrony as markers of PTSD and resilience following chronic early trauma. Depression and anxiety, 38(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23106

Palanski, M. E., & Vogelgesang, G. R. (2011). Virtuous creativity: The effects of leader behavioural integrity on follower creative thinking and risk taking. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 28(3), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.219

Porges, S. W. (2021). Polyvagal Safety: Attachment, Communication, Self-Regulation (IPNB). WW Norton & Company. https://wwnorton.com/books/9781324016274

Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. G. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods: The laboratory approach. Wiley.

Tedeschi, R. G., Cann, A., Taku, K., Senol‐Durak, E., & Calhoun, L. G. (2017). The posttraumatic growth inventory: A revision integrating existential and spiritual change. Journal of traumatic stress, 30(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22155

Published

30.06.2024

How to Cite

ROMANOVSKA, D., LYTVYN, S., & MALYSHEVA, K. (2024). Ukrainian adaptation of the "Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale" (npss). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Psychology, 1(19), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2024.1(19).8

Most read articles by the same author(s)