Generational differences in work representations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2026.1(23).8

Keywords:

work, representations, generation theory, values, meaning of work, emotions

Abstract

Background. The understanding of work has undergone substantial changes over recent decades. These changes are particularly pronounced among younger generations. International studies demonstrate that Generation Y (Millennials) and Generation Z differ significantly in their expectations, values, and meaning-making related to work, contributing to a growing gap in mutual understanding between employees and employers or older managers. Therefore, understanding generational differences in perceptions of work has both theoretical and practical significance.

Methods. An online survey was conducted using psychodiagnostic instruments to assess the emotional, value, and meaning dimensions of work representations, as well as work motivation.

Results. Generational differences were identified in the value, meaning, and emotional dimensions of work representations. Representatives of Generation Z attached greater importance to income and work–life balance, associated work more frequently with money, and were less likely to attribute altruistic meaning to it. In contrast, representatives of Generations X and Y more often viewed work as a way to help others, express values of service, and contribute to society. This orientation was most pronounced among Generation X: in free associations, its members more frequently described work in terms of usefulness, calling, and personal engagement, attributed to it the meaning of "Value/Spirit of Service," and were less likely to associate work with financial reward. Representatives of Generation Y demonstrated the most emotionally charged perception of work: they more frequently associated work with stress, routine, and boredom, and more often reported feelings of sorrow, contempt, and surprise in relation to work.

Conclusions. Work representations differ across generations primarily in their value, meaning, and emotional dimensions. Generation Z is characterized by a stronger orientation toward financial rewards and work–life balance, whereas Generation X is more likely to attribute prosocial meaning to work, associating it with usefulness, calling, and service. Representatives of Generation Y demonstrate the most emotionally charged perception of work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Циркун, О. І., & Турчанінова, В. Є. (Укл.). (2012). Міжнародна стан-дартна класифікація професій ISCO-08: Огляд матеріалів Міжнародної організації праці. Інститут вищої освіти КНЕУ.

2025 Gen Z and Millennial Survey. (2025). Deloitte Global. https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-shared/docs/campaigns/2025/2025-genz-millennial-survey.pdf

Arora, S., Dubey, V., & Vyas, S. (2020). Study of work values of Gen Z students. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 8(3/4), 240–265. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2020.112179

Dwivedula, R. (2024). Why is Generation Z motivated at work? A qualitative exploration. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 44, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22273

Hirschi, A. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution: Issues and implications for career research and practice. The Career Development Quarterly, 66(3), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12142

Johnson, M., Growney, C., Chu, L., & Carstensen, L. (2023). Age differences in emotion-related outcomes of cognitive engagement and meaningfulness at work. Innovation in Aging, 7, Article 971. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.3119

Meet the Millennials. (2017). KPMG LLP. https://assets.kpmg.com/ content/dam/kpmgsites/uk/pdf/2017/04/Meet-the-Millennials-Secured.pdf

Moon, S., & Kim, Y. (2023). Subjective perceptions of ‘meaning of work' of Generation MZ employees of South Korean NGOs. Behavioral Sciences, 13(6), Article 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13060461

PwC's NextGen: A global generational study. (2013). PwC. https://www.mm-foundation.org/app/uploads/sites/mmf/files/pwc-nextgen-study-2013.pdf

Steger, M. F., & Dik, B. J. (2009). Work as meaning: Individual and organizational benefits of engaging in meaningful work. In Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology and Work. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335446.013.0011

The first global generation: Adulthood reimagined for a changing world. (2025). EYGM Limited. https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/insights/innovation/documents/ey-gl-global-generation-report-final-05-2025.pdf

Van der Laan, L., Ormsby, G., Fergusson, L., & McIlveen, P. (2023). Is this work? Revisiting the definition of work in the 21st century. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 15(2), 252–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-04-2023-0035

Published

16.07.2026

How to Cite

Klymenko, I., & Shumska, V. (2026). Generational differences in work representations. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Psychology, 1(23), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2026.1(23).8

Most read articles by the same author(s)