The "Self-Trust" and "Trust in the Group" scales: pilot testing of components of a methodology for measurement the level of clients' trust in group psychotherapeutic work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2026.1(23).16Keywords:
trust, self-trust, trust in the group, psychotherapy group, group psychotherapy, therapeutic allianceAbstract
Background. Amid prolonged military aggression and complex sociocultural crises in Ukraine, there is an urgent need to optimize evidence-based forms of psychological assistance, particularly group psychotherapy. The effectiveness of the group process depends on the phenomenon of trust; however, there is a severe shortage of valid instruments in the Ukrainian scientific community for measuring its specific dimensions in a psychotherapeutic context.
The aim of this article is to provide a theoretical justification and empirical validation of the first two scales of the author's four-dimensional methodology for determining clients' level of trust in psychotherapy: "Self-Trust" and "Trust in the Group."
Methods. Two author-developed scales were constructed: "Self-Trust" and "Trust in the Group". To test the construct validity of individual statements, the standardized "Methodology of Trust/Distrust of the World, Other People, and Oneself" by A. Kupreichenko (adapted by O. Savchenko and V. Petrenko) was used. Mathematical and statistical analysis was performed in the Jamovi 2.6.26 environment using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha (α), Ferguson's delta, and other criteria.
Results. The study involved 63 participants with experience in group interaction and psychotherapy. CFA confirmed the structural validity of the "Self-Trust" scale (CFI = 0.975; TLI = 0.969; RMSEA = 0.032; overall α = 0.806) and the "Trust in the Group" scale (CFI = 0.939; TLI = 0.924; RMSEA = 0.068; overall α = 0.832). The "Self-Trust" scale (14 items) has a three-factor structure, comprising the subscales: "Self-Focus," "Trust in One's Own Feelings," and "Self-Assurance." The "Trust in the Group" scale (12 items) is characterized by a two-factor structure, integrating the subscales: "Expectations of Group Work" (projective fears) and "Readiness for Group Interaction."
Conclusions. The developed psychodiagnostic instrument has sufficient psychometric properties, demonstrating high internal consistency of the subscales and discriminative power of the statements. The practical value of the scales lies in the ability to prescreen clients before involving them in a group setting, predict the risks of premature termination of psychotherapy, and flexibly adjust the therapeutic strategy to build a reliable alliance between the psychotherapist and the client.
Downloads
References
The Mental Health of Ukrainians and Their Attitudes Toward Psychological Support During the War (2024). Gradus Research [in Ukrainian]. https://mms.gov.ua/news/tretia-khvylia-doslidzhennia-gradus-research-psykhichne-zdorovia-ta-stavlennia-ukraintsiv-do-psykholohichnoi-dopomohy-pid-chas-viiny
Savchenko, O. V., & Borisova, O. S. (2025). Adaptation of the "Psychological Immune System Inventory (PISI)" into Ukrainian: A Shortened Version. Ukrainian Psychological Journal, 1, 204–226 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.17721/upj.2025.1(23).10
Savchenko, O. V., Petrenko, V. V., & Timakova, A. V. (2022). "Methodology of Trust/Distrust of the World, Other People, and Oneself" (A. Kupreichenko): Ukrainian-language adaptation, validation, and standardization. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Psychology, 5, 16–22 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2022.5.3
Savchenko, O. V., & Pronina, E. V. (2025) Ukrainian-language adaptation of the "Organizational Commitment Questionnaire" methodology: loyalty to the organization and educational institution. Scientific Notes of the National University "Ostroh Academy": "Psychology" Series. NaUOA Publishing House, 19, 50–62 [in Ukrainian]. http://doi.org/10.25264/2415-7384-2025-19-50-62
Alexander, J. C. (2004). Cultural trauma and collective identity.
In J. C. Alexander, R. Eyerman, B. Giesen, N. J. Smelser, & P. Sztompka (Eds.), Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity (pp. 1–30). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520235946.003.0001
Alldredge, C. T., Burlingame, G. M., Yang, C., & Rosendahl, J. (2021). Alliance in group therapy: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 25(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000135
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behav-ioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-295X.84.2.191
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2013). Mentalization-based treatment. Psychoan-alytic Inquiry, 33(6), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.835170
Govier, T. (1993). Self-trust, autonomy, and self-esteem. Hypatia, 8(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1993.tb00630.x
Group therapy is as effective as individual therapy, and more effi-cient. Here's how to do it successfully (2023). American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/03/continuing-education-group-therapy
Hett, V. (2024). Towards mutual trust and understanding: establish-ing effective communication between Ukrainian refugees and Swiss government institutions. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 6, 1445749. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1445749
Iglesias, D., Sorrel, M. A., & Olmos, R. (2025). Cross-validation and predictive metrics in psychological research: Do not leave out the leave-one-out. Behavior Research Methods, 57(3), 85. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02588-w
Johnson, D. P., Penn, D. L., Bauer, D. J., Meyer, P., & Evans, E. (2008). Predictors of the therapeutic alliance in group therapy for individ-uals with treatment-resistant auditory hallucinations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466507X241604
Koul, A., Becchio, C., & Cavallo, A. (2018). Cross-Validation Approaches for Replicability in Psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1117. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01117
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
Marmarosh, C. L., Sandage, S. J., Wade, N., Captari, L. E., & Crab-tree, S. A. (2022). New horizons in group psychotherapy research and practice from third wave positive psychology: a practice-friendly review. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 25(3), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2022.643
McLeod, C. (2002). Self-trust and reproductive autonomy. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6157.001.0001
Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. (2001). Performance of Bootstrapping Approaches to Model Test Statistics and Parameter Standard Error Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15328007SEM0803_2
Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interper-sonal relationships: As developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 184–256). McGraw-Hill. https://www.beeleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/rogers_chapter_in_koch-1.pdf
Rosendahl, J., Alldredge, C. T., Burlingame, G. M., & Strauss, B. (2021). Re-cent developments in group psychotherapy research. American Journal of Psy-chotherapy, 74(2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20200031
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2020). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (6th ed.). Basic Books. https://pinkpantheractivists.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Theory-and-Practice-of-Group-Psychhe-Irvin-D.-Yalom-Molyn-Leszcz.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Psychology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
