Modification of the Asthenic State Assessment Scale

Authors

  • Olena SAVCHENKO Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Author
  • Tata DVORIAKOVSKA Vadym Hetman Kyiv National Economic University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2025.2(22).18

Keywords:

asthenia, chronic fatigue syndrome, asthenic syndrome, Asthenic State Scale, cognitive manifestations, emotional manifestations, physiological manifestations, psychometric characteristics

Abstract

Background. Against the backdrop of chronic stress, manifestations of asthenic syndrome are becoming more widespread among Ukrainians. The issue of developing reliable means of psychological assessment of this condition has become acute.

Methods. This article presents the results of the Ukrainian-language adaptation of the “Asthenic State Scale (ASS-15)”. Confirmatory and exploratory (using the maximum likelihood method with Oblimin rotation) factor analysis procedures were applied. The main psychometric characteristics were determined using reliability assessment methods (Cronbach’s alpha, item-residual correlation), test discrimination (Ferguson’s delta, adapted for the Likert scale), and criterion validity (one-way analysis of variance using the nonparametric chi-square test).

Results. Empirical research has shown that some of the questions in the unadapted Ukrainian-language version of the scale demonstrate low reliability and validity, which calls into question its accuracy and diagnostic value. Based on the results of factor analysis, additional subscales were identified that reflect various aspects/domains of asthenic syndrome. Based on the data obtained, the structure of the questionnaire was optimised: questions that showed low reliability and validity were removed. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed the relevance of implementing a three-component model (X2 = 110, p = 0.05; CFI = 0.961; TLI = 0.953; RMSEA = 0.047, [0.02-0.07]). The updated version of the methodology is more compact, has sufficiently high internal consistency indicators (Cronbach's alpha from 0.70 to 0.83), allows for a differentiated assessment of individual components of asthenic state, and can be recommended for use in clinical, psychological, and scientific research.

Conclusions. The article provides justification for the reduction and modification of the Asthenic State Scale and describes the procedure for distinguishing three subscales: cognitive, emotional, and physiological manifestations of asthenia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Law of Ukraine "On the mental health care system in Ukraine" No. 4223-IX. (2025, January 15). Official web portal of the Parliament of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/4223-20 [in Ukrainian]

Methods for detecting chronic fatigue and professional burnout and ways of their prevention and preservation of the working capacity of medical personnel of modern healthcare institutions: methodological recommendations. (2022). Bogomolets National Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]

ICD-10-AM: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Tenth Revision. Australian Modification. (2017). https://kod.poltavalk.com.ua/mkkh-10-am [in Ukrainian]

Savchenko, O. V., Sukach, S. A., & Timakova, A. V. (2022). The “Personal resources” methodology: validation and standardization on a sample of youth persons. Habitus, 44, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.32682/2663-5208.2022.44.19 [in Ukrainian]

Avellaneda Fernández, A., Pérez Martín, Á., Izquierdo Martínez, M., Arruti Bustillo, M., Barbado Hernández, F. J., De La Cruz Labrado, J., ... & Ramón Giménez, J. R. (2009). Chronic fatigue syndrome: Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. BMC Psychiatry, 9(Suppl 1), S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-9-S1-S1

Barna, O. M., & Kalinichenko, M. A. (2021). Asthenic syndrome: New challenges – a new approach. Medicine of Ukraine, 4(250), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.37987/1997-9894.2021.4(250).238120

Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. (1997). American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(3), 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.3.408

Cohen, R. J., Schneider, W. J., & Tobin, R. M. (2021). Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurements. McGraw-Hill.

DSM-5-TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (2024). American Psychiatric Association. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm

Grinde, B. (2017). Stress and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. In C. L. Cooper & J. C. Quick (Eds.), The Handbook of Stress and Health (1st ed., pp. 135–146). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118993811.ch8

ICD-11: International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. (2020). World Health Organization. https://icd.who.int

Kluger, B. M., Krupp, L. B., & Enoka, R. M. (2013). Fatigue and fatigability in neurologic illnesses: Proposal for a unified taxonomy. Neurology, 80(4), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f07be

Ljungström, M., Oltra, E., & Pardo, M. (2024). Stress-Related Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Case Report with a Positive Response to Alpha-Methyl-P-Tyrosine (AMPT) Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(14), 7778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147778

Meijer, R. (2017). Dutch committee on tests and testing (COTAN): current trends in testing. Nederlands Instituut van Psychologen. https://nip.nl/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/COTAN-review-system-for-evaluating-test-quality.pdf

Ocon, A. J. (2013). Caught in the thickness of brain fog: Exploring the cognitive symptoms of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Frontiers in Physiology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00063

Payenok, A. V., & Bakun, O.-N. A. (2024). Comparative characteristics of asthenia and quality of life in patients with post-COVID syndrome. Psychiatry Neurology and Medical Psychology, 26, 411–419. https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-5675-2024-26-06

Sandoval, A., Li, M., & Jason, L. A. (2025). Two neurocognitive domains identified for patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. Frontiers in Neurology, 16, 1612548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1612548

Trojsi, F., Di Nardo, F., D’Alvano, G., Passaniti, C., Sharbafshaaer, M., ... & Siciliano, M. (2023). Cognitive, behavioral, and brain functional connectivity correlates of fatigue in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain and Behavior, 13(7), e2931. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2931

Yuryeva, L. M., Shusterman, T. Y., & Podolska, L. V. (2022). Clinical and psychometric study of asthenia in foreign applicants for medical education at different stages of training. Medicni perspektivi, 27(4), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2022.4.271189

Yuzvishinа, E., & Svistilnik, R. (2022). Asthenic syndrome and its correction in the structure of anxiety and depressive disorders. Hypertension, 3.53, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-1485.3.53.2017.106847

Zhang, Y.-D., & Wang, L.-N. (2024). Research progress in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome through interventions targeting the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 15, 1373748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1373748

Published

30.12.2025

How to Cite

SAVCHENKO, O., & DVORIAKOVSKA, T. (2025). Modification of the Asthenic State Assessment Scale. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Psychology, 2(22), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2025.2(22).18

Most read articles by the same author(s)