Using social media and subjective well-being during COVID-19 pandemic

Authors

  • Illia Yahiiaiev Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine Author
  • Alina Novoselska Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine Author
  • Vladyslava Keller Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine Author
  • Marta Savych Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/BSP.2020.1(11).13

Keywords:

psychological well-being, subjective well-being, pandemic, life satisfaction, social media, conspiracy theories, COVID-19

Abstract

The relevance of the topic is related to the psychosocial consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim is to study the subjective well-being during the beginning of the pandemic and introduction of the quarantine measures and their connection to social media activity. The methods employed in the present study include various types of questionnaires, namely the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) (Watson, Clark & Tellegen, 1988), the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) (Diener, Emmnos, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995), and an original questionnaire developed to study the impact of the pandemic and the respondents’ understanding and perceptions of it. The findings of the quantitative analysis show that the subjective well-being during the pandemic is connected to the use of social media, life satisfaction, health risks assessments and economic consequences, leisure time and the level of self-efficacy. A qualitative analysis indicates that at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine the negative predictions of the consequences of both the pandemic and the implemented quarantine measures prevail among the subjects. A longitudinal study during one month has found a reduction in health concerns, and respondents began to assess the threat to their health and economic consequences of the coronavirus pandemic as less serious than at the beginning. Thus, it can be concluded that from a short-term perspective the negative affect, especially the levels of fear and anxiety, decreased, whereas the level of the positive affect did not change.

References

Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2019). Religiosity and well-being. Encyclopeadia of personality and individual differences. Switzerland: Springer Nature.10, 978-3.

Bottesi G., Ghisi M., Sica C., Freeston M. (2017). Intolerance of Uncertainty, Not Just Right Experiences, and Compulsive Checking: Test of a Moderated Mediation Model on a Non-Clinical Sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry 73:111-119.

Delle Fave A., Massimini A. F., Bassi M. (2011). Hedonism and eudaimonism in positive psychology. Psychological Selection and Optimal Experience Across Cultures. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Vol. 2. P. 3-18.

Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.

Fergus, T. A., Bardeen, J. R., Orcutt, H. K. (2015). Examining the specific facets of distress tolerance that are relevant to health anxiety. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29(1), 32–44.

Frost, R. O., Steketee, G. (2002). Cognitive approaches to obsessions and compulsions: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Pergamon/Elsevier Science Inc.

Groarke J., Berry E., Graham-Wisener L. (2020). Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study.

Király, Orsolya, Potenza. (2020). Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance. Comprehensive Psychiatry.

Kim E. (2017). Maintaining Healthy Behavior: a Prospective Study of Psychological Well-Being and Physical Activity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 337–347.

Lauriola, M., Mosca, O., Trentini, C., Foschi, R., Tambelli, R., & Carleton, R. N. (2018). The intolerance of uncertainty inventory: validity and comparison of scoring methods to assess individuals screening positive for anxiety and depression. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 388.

Lawton E., Brymer E., Clough P., Denovan A. (2017) The Relationship between the Physical Activity Environment, Nature Relatedness, Anxiety, and the Psychological Well-being Benefits of Regular Exercisers. Front. Psychol. 8:1058.

Lloyd, A. (2014). Social media, help or hindrance: What role does social media play in young people's mental health? Psychiatria Danubina. № 26. p. 340–346.

Moritz S., Pohl R., (2009). Biased Processing of Threat-Related Information Rather Than Knowledge Deficits Contributes to Overestimation of Threat in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Behavior modification 33(6):763-77.

Najmul А. (2020). Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Pittman M., Reich B. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior. Volume 62, Pages 155-167.

Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., & Lewis, R. F. (2015). Frequent use of social networking sites is associated with poor psychological functioning among children and adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 380-385.

Shihata, S., McEvoy, P. M., Mullan, B. A., & Carleton, R. N. (2016). Intolerance of uncertainty in emotional disorders: What uncertainties remain?. Journal of anxiety disorders, 41, 115-124.

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, 1(1), 35-37.

Strong, P. (1990). Epidemic psychology: a model. Sociology of Health & Illness 12(3): 249-259.

Tang, L., Bie, B., Park, S. E., & Zhi, D. (2018). Social media and outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases: A systematic review of literature. American journal of infection control, 46(9), 962-972.

Taylor, S. (2019). The psychology of pandemics: Preparing for the next global outbreak of infectious disease. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Utz, S., Breuer, J. (2017). The relationship between use of social network sites, online social support, and well-being: Results from a six-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 29(3), 115-125.

Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & behavior, 9(5), 584-590.

Weigmann K. (2018). The genesis of a conspiracy. EMBO Rep 19:e45935

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

Yang C., Tsai J., Pan S. (2020). Discrimination and Well-Being Among Asians/Asian Americans During COVID-19: The Role of Social Media. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Yahiiaiev, I., Novoselska, A., Keller, V., & Savych, M. (2020). Using social media and subjective well-being during COVID-19 pandemic. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Psychology, 1(11), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.17721/BSP.2020.1(11).13

Most read articles by the same author(s)