Psychological aspects of security and privacy in the digital environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2024.2(20).17Keywords:
digital privacy, psychological safety, social media self-presentation, personal cybersecurity, media competenceAbstract
Background. In the era of rapid digitalization and the increase in social network users to 5.5 billion people (67.1 % of the global population), safeguarding personal privacy in the digital realm has become increasingly significant. According to Pew Research Center (2024), 79 % of users are concerned about personal data protection, while privacy violations are showing a worrying upward trend. The study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the psychological mechanisms of privacy management in social networks and to develop evidence-based strategies for safeguarding users' psychological well-being.
Methods. The research employes a combination of systemic and person-centered approaches along with social cognitive theory. A diverse range of theoretical methods (systematic literature review, meta-analysis of empirical research, conceptual modeling) and empirical methods (psychodiagnostic techniques, neuropsychological studies, longitudinal observations) were utilized. A meta-analysis of 166 studies, encompassing over 75,000 participants, was conducted.
Results. The existence of the "privacy paradox" — the gap between stated privacy concerns and actual user behavior — has been empirically verified. A significant correlation was found between privacy violations and a decline in psychological well-being, indicated by increased levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Neuropsychological studies revealed the activation of specific brain structures during decision-making related to information disclosure. The research also examined the digital resilience scale and identified the primary manipulative strategies employed in social networks: persuasion (33 %), agitation (17 %), and information distortion (15 %).
Conclusions. The need for a comprehensive approach to privacy protection that combines the development of digital competence, media literacy, and psychological resilience has been established. The effectiveness of a media psychological support system through interconnected areas of media analytics, media therapy, and media education has been substantiated. The research findings provide a theoretical basis for designing psychological support programs for social network users and enhancing privacy protection systems.
Downloads
References
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2020). Secrets and likes: The drive for privacy and the difficulty of achieving it in the digital age. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 736–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1191
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Baruh, L., Secinti, E., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2017). Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12276
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Boyd, D., & Marwick, A. (2011). Social privacy in networked publics: Teens' attitudes, practices, and strategies. Oxford Internet Institute.
Butyrina, M. V. (2012). Media psychology: To the question of formation of educational discipline. Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University, 25(64), 85–90 [in Ukrainian].
Chuiko, H. V., Chaplak, Y. V., & Komisaryk, M. I. (2021). Psychological security of personality in an unstable world. Psychological Journal, 7(1), 6–81 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2021.7.1.6
Craig, W., Boniel-Nissim, M., King, N., Walsh, S. D., Boer, M., Donnelly, P. D., ... Pickett, W. (2020). Social media use and cyber-bullying: A cross-national analysis of young people in 42 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), S100–S108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.006
Derevianko, N. (2024). Protection of the right to privacy in the context of global digitalization. Journal of Innovation and Technologies in Social Work and Education, 8(26), 591–603 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2024-8(26)-591-603
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080
Distler, V., Fassl, M., Habib, H., Krombholz, K., Lenzini, G., Lallemand, C., Koenig, V., & Faith Cranor, L. (2023). Empirical research methods in usable privacy and security. In N. Gerber, A. Stöver, & K. Marky (Eds.), Human factors in privacy research (pp. 29–53). Springer.
Dovbush, O., Harasym, T., & Skoreiko-Svirska, I. (2023). Verbalization of manipulative strategies in social networks Facebook and Twitter. Folium, Special Issue, 54–60 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080
Laptiev, S. O. (2024). Development of personal data protection model in social networks. Information Protection, 26(1), 43–50 [in Ukrainian].
Naidonova, L. A., & Baryshpolets, O. T. (Eds.). (2009). Media culture of personality: socio-psychological approach. Milenium [in Ukrainian].
Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford Law Books.
Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. State University of New York Press.
Petrunko, O. V. (2011). Aggressive media environment: Qualitative and content discourses. Native language, 16, 36–43 [in Ukrainian].
Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships: As developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.) Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 184–256). McGraw-Hill.
Spravtseva, K. (2024). Psychological analysis of the structural components of the self-image in visual self presentation. Scientific Perspectives, 6(48), 1013–1023. https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2024-6(48) [in Ukrainian].
Tiahlo, O. V. (2017). Critical thinking in action, or Experience of critical review. Postmethodology, 1, 8–13 [in Ukrainian].
Trepte, S, & Reinecke, L. (2011). Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6
Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. Atheneum.
Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2017). Parents just don't understand: Why teens don't talk to parents about their online risk experiences. In Ch. P. Lee, & S. Poltrock (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 523–540). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998236
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Psychology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
