Field Dependence / Field Independence as a Factor of Individual Travel Style

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2023.1(17).6

Keywords:

Cognitive style, field dependence, travel, youth, psychology of recreation

Abstract

Background. Means of restoring a normative mental state, increasing stress resistance is the most urgent problem today. Traveling as a way of leisure and recreation began not so long ago - from the second half of the 20th century. The desire for changes and life movement is an unconscious natural desire for the development and manifestation of individual research strategies and cognitive processes, that is, cognitive style. The purpose of our article is to highlight the results of a pilot study of the connection between field dependence and field dependence with an individual style of recreational activity (travel).
Methods. The following methods were used: the Gottschaldt test of included figures, a questionnaire and an in-depth interview: The sample consisted of 20 people (N=20), of which 11 were women and 9 were men, aged from 20 to 25 years. All participants took part in the survey voluntarily, with informed consent.
Results. It was found that among field-dependent respondents, 7 people chose "within the country", "abroad" and "in nature", 3 people -"around their city" and "to "exotic" countries" as a travel option. As a method of travel, 8 people chose "plane", 5 - "on foot" and "bus", 4 - "train" and "car". No one chose "bicycle or boat". In terms of travel environment preferences, 5 people would prefer to travel alone, 9 in pairs. As a travel option, among field-independent people, 5 people chose "around their city" and "abroad", 4 - "to "exotic" countries", 3 - "in nature" and "around their city". As a method of travel, 6 people of the rite of passage "on foot", 4 - "car" and "plane", 3 - "train", "bus" and "bicycle". The choice of travel environment was as follows: 5 people chose "alone" and "in pairs", 3 - "with a tourist group". It is interesting that field-independent respondents did not choose the options "in their city" and much less often - "in nature".
Conclusion. It was established that field-dependent individuals tend to choose to travel alone or in pairs. Instead, field-independent respondents more often prefer to travel within their country or abroad, sometimes by train, bus or bicycle, but are ready to spend this time either independently, as a couple or with a tourist group.

References

Bian, Y., Zhou, C., Chen, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, J., & Yang, C. (2020, May). The role of the field dependence-independence construct on the flowperformance link in virtual reality. In Symposium on interactive 3D graphics and games, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384382.3384529

Dai, F., Wang, D., & Kirillova, K. (2022). Travel inspiration in tourist decision making. Tourism Management, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104484

De Vos, J., & Singleton, P. A. (2020). Travel and cognitive dissonance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 138, 525-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.014

Giancola, M., Palmiero, M., Piccardi, L., & D'amico, S. (2022). The relationships between cognitive styles and creativity: The role of field dependence-independence on visual creative production. Behavioral Sciences, 12(7), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070212

Haggar, P., Whitmarsh, L., & Skippon, S. M. (2019). Habit discontinuity and student travel mode choice. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 64, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.022

Hall, J. K. (2000). Field dependence-independence and computer-based instruction in geography [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University]. Corpus ID: 59871102

Kim, J., Giroux, M., Park, J., & Lee, J. C. (2022). An evolutionary perspective in tourism: the role of socioeconomic status on extremeness aversion in travel decision making. Journal of Travel Research, 61(5), 1187-1200. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211024738

Miliutina К., Trofmov А., Zelenin V., Andrushchenko T., Karamushka L. (2022, 6 September) The Role of Pets in Preserving the Emotional and Spiritual Wellbeing of Ukrainian Residents During Russian Hostilities. Journal of Religion and Health, 62, 500-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01669-4

Miller, A. L. (2007). Creativity and cognitive style: The relationship between field-dependence-independence, expected evaluation, and creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(4), 243246. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.4.243

Otoo, F. E., & Kim, S. (2020). Analysis of studies on the travel motivations of senior tourists from 1980 to 2017: Progress and future directions. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(4), 393-417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1540560

Van der Vlugt, A. L., Curl, A., & Scheiner, J. (2022). The influence of travel attitudes on perceived walking accessibility and walking behaviour. Travel Behaviour and Society, 27, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.11.002

Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Davis, A., & Jurasek, M. (2008). Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and selfactivation hypotheses. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 121127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.005

Weller, H. G., Repman, J., & Rooze, G. E. (2020). The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive style in hypermedia-based instruction: Implications for design of HBI. In Planning Continuing Professional Development (pp. 401-420). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003075301

Wong, I. A., Liu, D., Li, N., Wu, S., Lu, L., & Law, R. (2019). Foodstagramming in the travel encounter. Tourism Management, 71, 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.020

Published

14.06.2023

How to Cite

Milutina, K., & Obukhova, M. (2023). Field Dependence / Field Independence as a Factor of Individual Travel Style. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Psychology, 1(17), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2023.1(17).6