Psychosemantic peculiarities of Ukrainian, French and African youth's perceptions of imperialism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/BPSY.2024.1(19).9Keywords:
imperialism, French imperialism, Russian imperialism, geopolitical consciousness, semantic differential, psychosemantic researchAbstract
B a c k g r o u n d . The current geopolitical situation, including Russia"s war against Ukraine, makes the study of young people"s perceptions of imperialism relevant. Imperialism is a multifaceted phenomenon that has economic, cultural, and socio-political impact. The purpose of the study is to identify and analyze the constructs used by young people in different countries to perceive France and Russia as imperialist powers.
M e t h o d s . A mixed-methods research was conducted, combining qualitative methods (analysis of interviews using George Kelly"s theory of personal constructs and an association experiment) with statistical methods, such as regression analysis.
R e s u l t s . The qualitative analysis showed that respondents used different constructs to describe France and Russia. African respondents most often mentioned constructs related to power and domination, while French respondents focused on imperialism and cultural differences.
Ukrainian respondents focused on cultural differences and ideology. Detailed analysis allowed us to identify eleven constructs that were used in the questionnaire with a semantic differential.
The regression analysis showed that for African respondents, the most important constructs for perceiving France in the context of imperialism are "Hostile – Friendly", "Eastern – Western" and "Militaristic – Pacifist", and for Russia – "Hostile – Friendly", "Aggressive – Peaceful" and "Discriminating – Discriminated". In the French group, the construct Aggressive – Peaceful is significant for the perception of France, while for Russia it is Militaristic – Pacifist. In the Ukrainian group, the constructs "Hostile – Friendly" and "Conservative – Modern" are significant for the perception of France, while for Russia – "Aggressive – Peaceful" and "Authoritarian – Democratic".
C o n c l u s i o n s . The analysis of qualitative data showed that different groups of respondents have different perceptions of French and Russian imperialism, focusing on cultural, ideological and historical aspects. The regression analysis confirmed the importance of the constructs "Hostile – Friendly", "Aggressive – Peaceful" and "Militaristic – Pacifist" for the perception of both countries. This study highlights the importance of cultural and social context in shaping geopolitical perceptions.
References
Дроздов, О. Ю. (2010). Структурно–змістовні особливості геополітич- ної свідомості студентської молоді (на прикладі Чернігівського регіону). Вісник Чернігівського національного педагогічного університету. Серія: Психологічні науки, 1(82), 154–158. https://epub.chnpu.edu.ua/jspui /bitstream/123456789/1861/1/Структурно-змістовні%20особливості%20геополітичної%20свідомості%20студентської%20молоді%20%28на%20 прикладі%20Чернігівського%20регіону%29.pdf
Дроздов, О. Ю. (2015). Психосемантичні особливості геополітичних уявлень української та російської молоді під час міждержавного конфлікту 2014 року. Наукові студії із соціальної та політичної психології, (35), 103–112.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Greene, J., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed–Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163620
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton.
Münkler, H., & Camiller, P. (2007). Empires: The logic of world domination from ancient Rome to the United States. Polity Press.
Said, E. W. (1994). Culture and Imperialism. A Division of Random House, Inc
References
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage
Drozdov O. Yu. (2010). Structural and Content Characteristics of the Geopolitical Consciousness of Student Youth (Based on the Example of the Chernihiv Region).
Bulletin of the Chernihiv National Pedagogical University. Series: Psychological sciences, 1(82), 154–158 [in Ukrainian]. https://epub.chnpu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream /123456789/1861/1/Структурно-змістовні%20особливості%20геополітичної%20свідомості%20студентської%20молоді%20%28на%20прикладі% 20Чернігівського%20регіону%29.pdf
Drozdov O. Yu. (2015). Psychosemantic Features of the Geopolitical Perceptions of Ukrainian and Russian Youth During the Interstate Conflict of 2014. Scientific Studies in Social and Political Psychology, (35), 103–112 [in Ukrainian].
Greene, J., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed–Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163620
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton.
Münkler, H., & Camiller, P. (2007). Empires: The logic of world domination from ancient Rome to the United States. Polity Press.
Said, E. W. (1994). Culture and Imperialism. A Division of Random House, Inc
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Марія СКУЙБИД, Елісо ГРИЩУК

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.